London Bombing and "Citizen Journalist" Response
Last month, images and stories of the
tragic London bombings pervaded television and
Internet media around the globe, but remarkably
professional journalists and photographers found
themselves unable to take credit. July’s London
bombings provided one of the first examples of world
news documented by unintentional journalists—
bystanders and survivors who utilized camera phones
and other wireless technology to document their
experience.
This was only the latest and most vivid example of
the global trend of ‘user generated content’ (UGC)
that is beginning to have a radical impact with the
news media worldwide. Now that a little time has
passed, PoliticsOnline offers this perspective on what
happened.
The BBC has been the global leader among news
media in developing UGC – first with the Tsunami and
now with the bombing – so we have focused a lot of
this special report on what happened with the BBC.
We are especially proud to have an exclusive by a
long time friend of PoliticsOnline, BBC’s Kate Goldberg
as she provides her own first-person account of
what happened in London on July 7, 2005.
Full Disclosure: PoliticsOnline has been working with
the BBC on a number of projects for several years.
Let us know what you think.
Phil Noble
Publisher
phil@politicsonline.com
Emily Miller, Editor
Eyewitness Report: From The Streets
by Kate Goldberg
News of the London bombs of July 7 first came to me
in an overheard snippet of mobile phone conversation
as I was pushing my baby daughter down a sunny
street on our way into central London. "There's been
a bomb at Liverpool Street," said a visibly-shaken
passer-by, with fear in his voice. It was something
that most Londoners had been anxiously anticipating
for a long time. I turned back home with a sense of
mounting dread. My fingers instinctively gripped my
phone and dialed my husband's number - to check he
was OK, and to see if he had any more news.
Five minutes later my phone went
again. It was my husband. "There's been another
bomb. A huge explosion outside my window. I just
wanted to tell you I'm OK. We're being evacuated
now." He spoke quickly, and I could hear shouting in
the background. One of his colleagues had seen a
roof being blown off a bus.
I rushed home as fast as I could and logged on. The
BBC News website was reporting a series of
explosions that had been caused by a power surge
on London underground. It didn't add up. How could
a power surge at the tube station have blown the
roof off a bus outside my husband's office window -
which is a five minute's walk from the nearest tube? I
turned on the radio and the TV. Everyone was
reporting the same story. I tried calling my husband
again - but the network was down.
For the next hour and a half I was glued to the TV
screen, which kept to the same line. For the first
time in my life, I sent an email to the BBC News Have
Your Say website, telling them my experience. As an
interactive editor at the BBC World Service, I spend
a lot of time thinking about how we can improve our
news coverage by listening to our audience, and
tapping into their vast wealth of experience. New
technology means they can both record and
disseminate the news quicker than any news
organization could do on its own.
The London bombs tested this more thoroughly than
any news story before.
Hundreds of mobile photos showing the immediate
aftermath of the bombing were being shared on sites
like Flickr. On blogs and online news sites,
eyewitnesses were reporting fleeing from the scene
of one explosion only to be caught up in another. As
I surfed the internet, and continued to watch and
listen to the BBC, a picture of huge uncertainty
emerged. I'd heard nothing from my husband since
our brief phone conversation that morning - and I
feared that he could have been caught in another
bomb.
While in some ways technology was enabling news to
travel at lightening speed - with several mobile
videos emerging in the first few hours - it was
equally terrifying when it failed. Due to the huge
volume of mobile calls being made that day in central
London, the networks struggled to cope. For several
hours I was unable to contact my husband. As a
result, email traffic reportedly doubled. Mail filtering firm MessageLabs said that it was
seeing more than one million messages per hour pass
across its servers.
Eventually my husband made his way home, tired and
shaken. Like most Londoners, he had walked. He told
me how his workplace - The British Medical
Association - was being used as a mini-hospital and
temporary morgue. His medical colleagues were
treating the injured and dying. The pavement outside
was spattered with body-parts, and the building
soaked in blood.
For the second time, I was puzzled at the disjunction
between what I was hearing from my husband and
the reports of the mainstream media. The BBC
- along with other news outlets - were still reporting
only two fatalities.
"Well, two died inside the BMA alone," John said
grimly. It was difficult to estimate the number of
dead outside because there were so many body
parts, but one doctor thought it was about 13. This
later appeared spot on.
Again I emailed Have Your Say, and this time one of
the producers called back and interviewed my
husband
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/465
9237.stm That day the Have Your Say team
received about 20,000 emails, 3,000 SMS messages,
1,000 photos and 20 pieces of amateur video. They
also received comments from around the world on
the BBC language websites - some of which are
translated here - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4663811.stm
An image of the bus with its roof torn away was sent
in from a reader's camera phone within the first hour,
and was the main picture on the front page for most
of the day. It was also used on the BBC's rolling
news channel, News 24, as was much of the amateur
video.
The London bombs have changed many things in our
city. We look at each other uneasily on buses and
tubes, eyeing each other's bags. We talk more
readily to strangers. We no longer feel comfortable
taking our children into central London. And we all
clutch our mobile phones. Those of us with camera
phones can't fail to have seen the power of those
images.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4663561.stm
Kate Goldberg is an editor at BBC World
News Service. She and her family, pictured here, live
in London.
Stats: What Happened Online
*Following the bombings, eyewitnesses sent the BBC
over 20,000 e-mails, 1,000 photos and 20 videos in
24 hours.
http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/050712glaser/
*Over 1,500 non-professional photos of the London
bombings are posted on Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/groups/bomb/pool/. Photos
were posted on the site even before professional
news media got to the scene.
*Wikipedia allows users from all over the world to
edit entries on its wiki on various subjects. The entry
about the July 7 bombings was edited over 5,000
times in 2 weeks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings
*18% (34.5 million) of the 192 million cellphones in
the U.S. are camera phones. Camera phones are
even more prevalent in Europe because the
technology has been around longer and is more
integrated.
http://www.calendarlive.com/tv/cl-et-tv8jul08,0,1577992.story
*Where did U.S. readers go for news online on July
7? The top five most-visited sites were Yahoo News,
MSNBC, CNN, AOL News, and NYTimes.com. The BBC
ranked 11th, but received a 138% increase in traffic
from U.S. readers.
http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/050712glaser/
Pete Clifton: View From Inside BBC
Clifton is the head of BBC News Online and dealt
extensively with citizen response to the London
bombings.
While the use of photos and material from citizen
bystanders is not a new journalistic concept, openly
encouraging this kind of interaction is. Clifton has
addressed the issue several times in his online
column, explaining the need for this kind of coverage
and defending it against critics, who have argued
that citizen journalists may actually be citizen
paparazzi, or that citizen journalists should be
compensated for their contributions. Critics complain
that not paying those who send in images
is “cheating the very people you purport to serve.”
However, this has not been the BBC’s experience: as
Clifton reports, most reader contribution has
come from people who simply want to share what
they saw, with no ulterior, monetary motive.
Clifton argues that citizen journalism facilitates a
positive relationship between the media and the
public it serves, saying, “The contributions of our
readers have not been a sideshow, they have been
at the heart of our coverage. It's hardly something
to celebrate at a time of such alarm and uncertainty,
but there has without question been another step
change in the relationship we have with our readers,
their comments and pictures.”
Read Clifton’s column:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4727579.stm
Reader Response:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4748483.stm
BBC’s Citizen Journalist Sections
BBC News Online has an entire section dedicated to
the July bombings, including an extensive “Your
Photos” section and amateur video captured on
mobile phones, a tribute to the victims, and blog
entries from “Rachel”, a survivor who made daily
postings to BBC News Online about her
experience.
Pictures:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/4660563.stm
Rachel’s Blog:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4670099.stm
Tribute to the Victims:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/uk/05/london_blasts/victims/default.stm
Elsewhere: Citizens’ Response to Other Media
Although our report focuses on BBC coverage, other
news outlets encouraged citizen participation after
the bombings as well. The Guardian News Blog
has a special section for readers to submit their
eyewitness accounts and to post messages of
condolence. MSNBC also openly asked for witness
contributions and has a similar blog diary to the BBC
written by “Saira”.
MSNBC:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8499792/
The Guardian:
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2005/07/07/your_eyewitness_accounts.html
Other sites dedicated to the London bombings
include:
The London Response Wiki:
http://dowire.org/wiki/London_responds
We’re Not Afraid.com:
http://www.werenotafraid.com/
Quotes: What’s It Mean
"We often get pictures from our readers, but never
as many as this, and the quality was very high. And
because people were on the scenes, they were
obviously better than anything news agencies could
offer.”—BBC News Interactive Pete Clifton.
"It seemed kind of wrong. The BBC and other news
Web sites were so overwhelmed it was almost like an
alternative source of news. “
--Tim Bradshaw, who posted photos from around
London on flickr.com, and said in an e-mail message
he was not sure at first whether he would post them.
“We've seen an amazing eruption of citizen journalism
stories since we launched Flickr. We have changed
the way news is done. What we're seeing is that
instant publishing has seeped into traditional
journalistic practice.” -- Caterina Fake, cofounder of
Flickr where many posted their London pictures. http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/entertainment/article/0,1299,DRMN_6_3924505,00.html
"Media organizations should learn to give away the
control. By doing so, they'll actually end up
maintaining more control. The ones that embrace this
will succeed...the others will go under.”—Rory
O’Connor, independent documentary filmmaker and
co-founder of the international media firm
Globalvision, Inc. O’Connor praised the incorporation
of citizen journalists at the first annual Wikimania
conference held in Germany in August 2005.
http://mediachannel.org/blog/node/526
“A lot of what's being done by the citizen-journalist
will be most useful as people start pulling together
the best images and stories," he said. "There was a
cliché that journalists write the first draft of history.
Now I think these people are writing the first draft of
history at some level, and that's an important shift."—
Dan Gillmor, author of We The Media and founder of
Grassroots Media. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/08/international/europe/08blog.html?ex=1123300800&en=abd5b59fc78f7807&ei=5070&th&emc=th
Critics Respond: Not Citizen Journalist but Citizen Paparazzi
While many applaud the marriage of amateur media
and mainstream news, not everyone is celebrating.
Some have called the response to the London
bombings "citizen paparazzi", arguing that if citizen
journalists are recognized they must uphold the same
ethical standards that professionals do.
The idea that the streets are now filled with
thousands of potential journalists armed with camera
phones can be unsettling—“Imagine Rodney King and
Abu Ghraib times a million. Everyone who works, or
moves around, in a public place should consider
whether they like the idea of all their movements
being recorded by nosy neighbors” said Dan Gillmor.
The BBC received feedback from viewers worried
about privacy and exploitation of the bombing
victims, as well as the effect that citizen journalism
has on the standards of established news
organizations like the BBC. Comments
included: “There is a worrying trend in which
requesting and displaying those pictures is becoming
an end in itself. This is yet another example of
dumbing down news coverage”, and “Calling for the
public to get more involved in reporting just takes us
further down the road of sensationalism.” http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4728945.stm
A London blogger who survived the Edgewater Road
bombing explained his experience with citizen
journalism from a victim’s point of view, saying “As I
stepped out people with camera phones vied to try
and take pictures of the worst victims. In crisis some
people are cruel. The people on the train weren’t all
trying to take pictures, we were shocked, dirty, and
helping each other.” Xeni Jardin, a freelance
technology journalist, remarked "It's like the behavior
when you see with a car wreck on the highway.
People stop and gawk. There's a sense that this is
some sort of animal behavior that's not entirely
compassionate or responsible.” To find out more
about “citizen paparazzi, read http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/050712glaser/
And the Future...
So are citizen journalists good for mainstream media,
or do they perpetuate a downward spiral to
sensationalism? Strong arguments support both sides
of the debate, but so far the BBC has opted to be on
the pro side. Citizen journalists are held to the same
editorial standards as BBC staff reporters, and
already the BBC has utilized reader content in other
unrelated stories as the role of citizen journalists
continues to evolve.
One thing is for certain, as technology improves,
citizen journalists will grow radically. The real
question is how with the mainstream media respond.
Clearly people now view the news in a different way
as they can participate in news...as it happens to
them.
We’re just at the beginning.